Alto-Shaam BQ-96vsContinental DL2WE-SA-PT-HD
Side-by-side holding cabinet comparison
Alto-Shaam BQ-96
Internal Volume
46.2cu ft
Max Idle Rate
235W
Energy Usage
235W
Doors
1
Continental DL2WE-SA-PT-HD
Internal Volume
46.1cu ft
Max Idle Rate
379W
Energy Usage
353W
Doors
8
Key differences
Alto-Shaam BQ-96 is 38% more efficient at 235 W versus 379 W for the Continental DL2WE-SA-PT-HD. The Alto-Shaam BQ-96 is larger at 46.2 cu ft versus 46.1 cu ft. Overall, the Continental DL2WE-SA-PT-HD sits higher in the category, ranking above 86% of certified commercial hot food holding cabinets.
Capacity
| Spec | Alto-Shaam | Continental |
|---|---|---|
| Internal Volume(cu ft) | 46.2 | 46.1 |
| Doors | 1 | 8 |
| Door / Wall Type | Solid | Solid |
Energy
| Spec | Alto-Shaam | Continental |
|---|---|---|
| Energy Usage(W) | 235 | 353 |
| Maximum Idle Rate(W) | 235 | 379 |