ATOSA ATHC-18ESvsCambro CMBH1826T
Side-by-side holding cabinet comparison
ATOSA ATHC-18ES
Internal Volume
18.2cu ft
Max Idle Rate
291W
Energy Usage
281W
Doors
1
Cambro CMBH1826T
Internal Volume
17.9cu ft
Max Idle Rate
290W
Energy Usage
122W
Doors
2
Key differences
Both models are closely matched on idle: 291 vs 290 W. The ATOSA ATHC-18ES is larger at 18.2 cu ft versus 17.9 cu ft.
Capacity
| Spec | ATOSA | Cambro |
|---|---|---|
| Internal Volume(cu ft) | 18.2 | 17.9 |
| Doors | 1 | 2 |
| Door / Wall Type | Transparent | Solid |
Energy
| Spec | ATOSA | Cambro |
|---|---|---|
| Energy Usage(W) | 281 | 122 |
| Maximum Idle Rate(W) | 291 | 290 |