SpecDirectory

Brio CLNLPOU520SCF2vsKOHLER K16

Side-by-side water cooler comparison

Brio CLNLPOU520SCF2

Daily Energy

0.64kWh/day

Type

Hot, Cook, and Cold Unit

Refrigerant

R-134a

GWP 1430 · Higher
Capacity Class

High Capacity

KOHLER K16

Daily Energy

0.53kWh/day

Type

Hot and Cold

Refrigerant

R-290, R-290

GWP 3 · Lower
Capacity Class

Low Capacity

Key differences

KOHLER K16 is 17% more efficient at 0.530 kWh/day versus 0.640 kWh/day for the Brio CLNLPOU520SCF2. The Brio CLNLPOU520SCF2 is larger at 0.6 kWh/day versus 0.5 kWh/day. KOHLER K16 uses a lower-impact refrigerant: R-290, R-290 (GWP 3) versus R-134a (GWP 1430). Overall, the Brio CLNLPOU520SCF2 sits higher in the category, ranking above 44% of certified commercial water coolers.

Performance

SpecBrioKOHLER
Daily Energy Use(kWh/day)0.6400.530
On-Mode Performance (Cold)0.4601.910
On-Mode Performance (Hot)0.3601.220

Dispensing

SpecBrioKOHLER
Cold Dispenser Capacity0.740.51
Hot Dispenser Capacity4634
Dispensed Temperature4848
Capacity ClassHigh CapacityLow Capacity

Configuration

SpecBrioKOHLER
TypeHot, Cook, and Cold UnitHot and Cold
Water SourceTap Water SourceTap Water Source
Water ConditioningConditioned StorageConditioned Storage

Refrigerant

SpecBrioKOHLER
TypeR-134aR-290, R-290
GWP RatingR-134a (GWP:1430)R-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP)

More comparisons