SpecDirectory

Brio CLPOU320UVF3vsKOHLER K16

Side-by-side water cooler comparison

Brio CLPOU320UVF3

Daily Energy

0.56kWh/day

Type

Hot and Cold

Refrigerant

R-134a

GWP 1430 · Higher
Capacity Class

Low Capacity

KOHLER K16

Daily Energy

0.53kWh/day

Type

Hot and Cold

Refrigerant

R-290, R-290

GWP 3 · Lower
Capacity Class

Low Capacity

Key differences

KOHLER K16 is 5% more efficient at 0.530 kWh/day versus 0.560 kWh/day for the Brio CLPOU320UVF3. The Brio CLPOU320UVF3 is larger at 0.6 kWh/day versus 0.5 kWh/day. KOHLER K16 uses a lower-impact refrigerant: R-290, R-290 (GWP 3) versus R-134a (GWP 1430).

Performance

SpecBrioKOHLER
Daily Energy Use(kWh/day)0.5600.530
On-Mode Performance (Cold)0.2201.910
On-Mode Performance (Hot)0.3001.220

Dispensing

SpecBrioKOHLER
Cold Dispenser Capacity0.590.51
Hot Dispenser Capacity1434
Dispensed Temperature4348
Capacity ClassLow CapacityLow Capacity

Configuration

SpecBrioKOHLER
TypeHot and ColdHot and Cold
Water SourceTap Water SourceTap Water Source
Water ConditioningConditioned StorageConditioned Storage

Refrigerant

SpecBrioKOHLER
TypeR-134aR-290, R-290
GWP RatingR-134a (GWP:1430)R-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP)

More comparisons