Cambro PCU2000HH615vsCres Cor HCUA11
Side-by-side holding cabinet comparison
Cambro PCU2000HH615
Internal Volume
15.6cu ft
Max Idle Rate
285W
Energy Usage
126W
Doors
2
Cres Cor HCUA11
Internal Volume
15cu ft
Max Idle Rate
285W
Energy Usage
225W
Doors
1
Key differences
Both models are closely matched on idle: 285 vs 285 W. The Cambro PCU2000HH615 is larger at 15.6 cu ft versus 15 cu ft.
Capacity
| Spec | Cambro | Cres Cor |
|---|---|---|
| Internal Volume(cu ft) | 15.6 | 15 |
| Doors | 2 | 1 |
| Door / Wall Type | Solid | Solid |
Energy
| Spec | Cambro | Cres Cor |
|---|---|---|
| Energy Usage(W) | 126 | 225 |
| Maximum Idle Rate(W) | 285 | 285 |