Cambro PCU800HH615vsCambro UPCH800
Side-by-side holding cabinet comparison
Cambro PCU800HH615
Internal Volume
7cu ft
Max Idle Rate
150W
Energy Usage
106W
Doors
2
Cambro UPCH800
Internal Volume
6.5cu ft
Max Idle Rate
139W
Energy Usage
80W
Doors
2
Key differences
Cambro UPCH800 is 7% more efficient at 139 W versus 150 W for the Cambro PCU800HH615. The Cambro PCU800HH615 is larger at 7 cu ft versus 6.5 cu ft.
Capacity
| Spec | Cambro | Cambro |
|---|---|---|
| Internal Volume(cu ft) | 7 | 6.5 |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Door / Wall Type | Solid | Solid |
Energy
| Spec | Cambro | Cambro |
|---|---|---|
| Energy Usage(W) | 106 | 80 |
| Maximum Idle Rate(W) | 150 | 139 |