Crystal Mountain TASM3KHS1ACvsKOHLER K16
Side-by-side water cooler comparison
Crystal Mountain TASM3KHS1AC
Daily Energy
0.65kWh/day
Type
Hot, Cook, and Cold Unit
Refrigerant
R-134a
GWP 1430 · Higher
Capacity Class
Low Capacity
KOHLER K16
Daily Energy
0.53kWh/day
Type
Hot and Cold
Refrigerant
R-290, R-290
GWP 3 · Lower
Capacity Class
Low Capacity
Key differences
KOHLER K16 is 18% more efficient at 0.530 kWh/day versus 0.650 kWh/day for the Crystal Mountain TASM3KHS1AC. The Crystal Mountain TASM3KHS1AC is larger at 0.7 kWh/day versus 0.5 kWh/day. KOHLER K16 uses a lower-impact refrigerant: R-290, R-290 (GWP 3) versus R-134a (GWP 1430). Overall, the Crystal Mountain TASM3KHS1AC sits higher in the category, ranking above 47% of certified commercial water coolers.
Performance
| Spec | Crystal Mountain | KOHLER |
|---|---|---|
| Daily Energy Use(kWh/day) | 0.650 | 0.530 |
| On-Mode Performance (Cold) | 0.290 | 1.910 |
| On-Mode Performance (Hot) | 0.720 | 1.220 |
Dispensing
| Spec | Crystal Mountain | KOHLER |
|---|---|---|
| Cold Dispenser Capacity | 0.61 | 0.51 |
| Hot Dispenser Capacity | 18 | 34 |
| Dispensed Temperature | 48 | 48 |
| Capacity Class | Low Capacity | Low Capacity |
Configuration
| Spec | Crystal Mountain | KOHLER |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Hot, Cook, and Cold Unit | Hot and Cold |
| Water Source | Bottle - Bottom Load | Tap Water Source |
| Water Conditioning | Conditioned Storage | Conditioned Storage |
Refrigerant
| Spec | Crystal Mountain | KOHLER |
|---|---|---|
| Type | R-134a | R-290, R-290 |
| GWP Rating | R-134a (GWP:1430) | R-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP) |