Crystal Mountain TASM3KHS1ACvsNECOA CHP-1300L
Side-by-side water cooler comparison
Crystal Mountain TASM3KHS1AC
Daily Energy
0.65kWh/day
Type
Hot, Cook, and Cold Unit
Refrigerant
R-134a
GWP 1430 · Higher
Capacity Class
Low Capacity
NECOA CHP-1300L
Daily Energy
0.45kWh/day
Type
Hot, Cook, and Cold Unit
Refrigerant
R-600A, R-600A
Capacity Class
Low Capacity
Key differences
NECOA CHP-1300L is 31% more efficient at 0.450 kWh/day versus 0.650 kWh/day for the Crystal Mountain TASM3KHS1AC. The Crystal Mountain TASM3KHS1AC is larger at 0.7 kWh/day versus 0.5 kWh/day. Overall, the Crystal Mountain TASM3KHS1AC sits higher in the category, ranking above 47% of certified commercial water coolers.
Performance
| Spec | Crystal Mountain | NECOA |
|---|---|---|
| Daily Energy Use(kWh/day) | 0.650 | 0.450 |
| On-Mode Performance (Cold) | 0.290 | 0.840 |
| On-Mode Performance (Hot) | 0.720 | 0.470 |
Dispensing
| Spec | Crystal Mountain | NECOA |
|---|---|---|
| Cold Dispenser Capacity | 0.61 | 0.57 |
| Hot Dispenser Capacity | 18 | 24 |
| Dispensed Temperature | 48 | 38 |
| Capacity Class | Low Capacity | Low Capacity |
Configuration
| Spec | Crystal Mountain | NECOA |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Hot, Cook, and Cold Unit | Hot, Cook, and Cold Unit |
| Water Source | Bottle - Bottom Load | Tap Water Source |
| Water Conditioning | Conditioned Storage | Conditioned Storage |
Refrigerant
| Spec | Crystal Mountain | NECOA |
|---|---|---|
| Type | R-134a | R-600A, R-600A |
| GWP Rating | R-134a (GWP:1430) | — |