Glacier Bay BY569vsPrimo 601376/601376-C
Side-by-side water cooler comparison
Glacier Bay BY569
Daily Energy
0.66kWh/day
Type
Hot and Cold
Refrigerant
R-134a
GWP 1430 · Higher
Capacity Class
High Capacity
Primo 601376/601376-C
Daily Energy
0.64kWh/day
Type
Hot and Cold
Refrigerant
R-134a
GWP 1430 · Higher
Capacity Class
High Capacity
Key differences
Primo 601376/601376-C is 3% more efficient at 0.640 kWh/day versus 0.660 kWh/day for the Glacier Bay BY569. The Glacier Bay BY569 is larger at 0.7 kWh/day versus 0.6 kWh/day.
Performance
| Spec | Glacier Bay | Primo |
|---|---|---|
| Daily Energy Use(kWh/day) | 0.660 | 0.640 |
| On-Mode Performance (Cold) | 0.850 | 0.460 |
| On-Mode Performance (Hot) | 0.640 | 0.360 |
Dispensing
| Spec | Glacier Bay | Primo |
|---|---|---|
| Cold Dispenser Capacity | 1.30 | 0.74 |
| Hot Dispenser Capacity | 43 | 46 |
| Dispensed Temperature | 41 | 48 |
| Capacity Class | High Capacity | High Capacity |
Configuration
| Spec | Glacier Bay | Primo |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Hot and Cold | Hot and Cold |
| Water Source | Bottle - Top Load | Tap Water Source |
| Water Conditioning | Conditioned Storage | Conditioned Storage |
Refrigerant
| Spec | Glacier Bay | Primo |
|---|---|---|
| Type | R-134a | R-134a |
| GWP Rating | R-134a (GWP:1430) | R-134a (GWP:1430) |