Hatco FSHC-17WDvsMetro C5T9D-ASB
Side-by-side holding cabinet comparison
Hatco FSHC-17WD
Internal Volume
21.1cu ft
Max Idle Rate
296W
Energy Usage
218W
Doors
2
Metro C5T9D-ASB
Internal Volume
21cu ft
Max Idle Rate
296W
Energy Usage
154W
Doors
2
Key differences
Both models are closely matched on idle: 296 vs 296 W. The Hatco FSHC-17WD is larger at 21.1 cu ft versus 21 cu ft.
Capacity
| Spec | Hatco | Metro |
|---|---|---|
| Internal Volume(cu ft) | 21.1 | 21 |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Door / Wall Type | Solid | Solid |
Energy
| Spec | Hatco | Metro |
|---|---|---|
| Energy Usage(W) | 218 | 154 |
| Maximum Idle Rate(W) | 296 | 296 |