Hatco IRNG-PC1-14vsSpring USA SM-1800LP
Side-by-side cooktop comparison
Hatco IRNG-PC1-14
Input Rate
1.4kW
Voltage
120V
Hobs
1
Cooking Efficiency
83%
Spring USA SM-1800LP
Input Rate
2kW
Voltage
120V
Hobs
1
Cooking Efficiency
80%
Key differences
Hatco IRNG-PC1-14 is 4% more efficient at 83.0 % versus 80.0 % for the Spring USA SM-1800LP. The Spring USA SM-1800LP is larger at 2 kW versus 1.4 kW. Overall, the Hatco IRNG-PC1-14 sits higher in the category, ranking above 12% of certified commercial electric cooktops.
Electrical
| Spec | Hatco | Spring USA |
|---|---|---|
| Nameplate Input Rate(kW) | 1.44 | 2 |
| Voltage(V) | 120 | 120 |
| Voltage Configuration | Single voltage | Single voltage |
Dimensions
| Spec | Hatco | Spring USA |
|---|---|---|
| Length(in) | 13 | 12 |
| Width(in) | 17 | 15 |
| Height(in) | 3 | 2 |
Cooking
| Spec | Hatco | Spring USA |
|---|---|---|
| Hobs | 1 | 1 |
| Cooking Efficiency(%) | 83 | 80 |
| Hob 1 Efficiency(%) | 83 | 80 |
| Hob 1 Area(sq in) | 156 | 57 |
| Hob 1 Shape | Square | Circle |
| Hob 1 Heat-Up Time(min) | 40 | 34 |
| Hob 1 Production(lb/hr) | 30 | 35 |
Configuration
| Spec | Hatco | Spring USA |
|---|---|---|
| Product Type | Induction Cooktop | Induction Cooktop |
| Induction Unit Position | — | Countertop Unit |