SpecDirectory

KOHLER K16vsLAGO CLPOU320UVF3

Side-by-side water cooler comparison

KOHLER K16

Daily Energy

0.53kWh/day

Type

Hot and Cold

Refrigerant

R-290, R-290

GWP 3 · Lower
Capacity Class

Low Capacity

LAGO CLPOU320UVF3

Daily Energy

0.56kWh/day

Type

Hot and Cold

Refrigerant

R-134a

GWP 1430 · Higher
Capacity Class

Low Capacity

Key differences

KOHLER K16 is 5% more efficient at 0.530 kWh/day versus 0.560 kWh/day for the LAGO CLPOU320UVF3. The LAGO CLPOU320UVF3 is larger at 0.6 kWh/day versus 0.5 kWh/day. KOHLER K16 uses a lower-impact refrigerant: R-290, R-290 (GWP 3) versus R-134a (GWP 1430).

Performance

SpecKOHLERLAGO
Daily Energy Use(kWh/day)0.5300.560
On-Mode Performance (Cold)1.9100.220
On-Mode Performance (Hot)1.2200.300

Dispensing

SpecKOHLERLAGO
Cold Dispenser Capacity0.510.59
Hot Dispenser Capacity3414
Dispensed Temperature4843
Capacity ClassLow CapacityLow Capacity

Configuration

SpecKOHLERLAGO
TypeHot and ColdHot and Cold
Water SourceTap Water SourceTap Water Source
Water ConditioningConditioned StorageConditioned Storage

Refrigerant

SpecKOHLERLAGO
TypeR-290, R-290R-134a
GWP RatingR-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP)R-134a (GWP:1430)

More comparisons