Southbend CSE-4-SBvsSterling SPG-6AF
Side-by-side steam cooker comparison
Southbend CSE-4-SB
Pan Capacity
4pans
Cooking Efficiency
51%
Water Use
0.9gal/hr
Fuel
Electric
Sterling SPG-6AF
Pan Capacity
6pans
Cooking Efficiency
53%
Water Use
1.6gal/hr
Fuel
Gas
Key differences
Sterling SPG-6AF is 4% more efficient at 53.0 % versus 51.0 % for the Southbend CSE-4-SB. The Sterling SPG-6AF is larger at 6 pans versus 4 pans.
Performance
| Spec | Southbend | Sterling |
|---|---|---|
| Pan Capacity(pans) | 4 | 6 |
| Cooking Efficiency(%) | 51 | 53 |
| Water Consumption(gal/hr) | 0.9 | 1.6 |
| Idle Rate(W) | 324 | — |
| Idle Rate (Gas)(BTU/hr) | — | 12350 |
Configuration
| Spec | Southbend | Sterling |
|---|---|---|
| Product Type | Pressureless | Pressureless |
| Fuel Source | Electric | Gas |
| Steam Generation | Boilerless | Boilerless |