Sterling SP208-10-3AFvsVulcan C24EO5AF
Side-by-side steam cooker comparison
Sterling SP208-10-3AF
Pan Capacity
6pans
Cooking Efficiency
79%
Water Use
1.6gal/hr
Fuel
Electric
Vulcan C24EO5AF
Pan Capacity
5pans
Cooking Efficiency
69%
Water Use
1.2gal/hr
Fuel
Electric
Key differences
Sterling SP208-10-3AF is 13% more efficient at 79.0 % versus 69.0 % for the Vulcan C24EO5AF. The Sterling SP208-10-3AF is larger at 6 pans versus 5 pans. Overall, the Sterling SP208-10-3AF sits higher in the category, ranking above 90% of certified commercial steam cookers.
Performance
| Spec | Sterling | Vulcan |
|---|---|---|
| Pan Capacity(pans) | 6 | 5 |
| Cooking Efficiency(%) | 79 | 69 |
| Water Consumption(gal/hr) | 1.6 | 1.2 |
| Idle Rate(W) | 330 | 310 |
Configuration
| Spec | Sterling | Vulcan |
|---|---|---|
| Product Type | Pressureless | Pressureless |
| Fuel Source | Electric | Electric |
| Steam Generation | Boilerless | Boilerless |