Arctic King AC35ESKCR1RCMvsKalamera KCF-100E
Side-by-side freezer comparison
Arctic King AC35ESKCR1RCM
Capacity
3.5cu ft
Annual Energy
174kWh/yr
Better Than Standard
10%
Type
Compact
Kalamera KCF-100E
Capacity
3.4cu ft
Annual Energy
172kWh/yr
Better Than Standard
10%
Type
Compact
Key differences
Both models are closely matched on annual energy: 174 vs 172 kWh/yr. The Arctic King AC35ESKCR1RCM is larger at 3.5 cu ft versus 3.4 cu ft.
Capacity
| Spec | Arctic King | Kalamera |
|---|---|---|
| Total Volume(cu ft) | 3.5 | 3.4 |
| Adjusted Volume(cu ft) | 6.2 | 6 |
Energy
| Spec | Arctic King | Kalamera |
|---|---|---|
| Annual Energy Use(kWh/yr) | 174 | 172 |
| US Federal Standard(kWh/yr) | 194 | 192 |
| Better Than Standard(%) | 10 | 10 |
| Most Efficient | No | No |
Configuration
| Spec | Arctic King | Kalamera |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Compact | Compact |
| Product Class | 18 - Compact chest freezers | 18 - Compact chest freezers |
| Defrost Type | Manual | Manual |
| Compact | Yes | Yes |
| Built In | No | No |
| Ice Maker | No | No |