Arctic King ARU030S1ARWWvsConserv FR300BG
Side-by-side freezer comparison
Arctic King ARU030S1ARWW
Capacity
3cu ft
Annual Energy
240kWh/yr
Better Than Standard
12%
Type
Compact
Conserv FR300BG
Capacity
3.1cu ft
Annual Energy
244kWh/yr
Better Than Standard
10%
Type
Compact
Key differences
Both models are closely matched on annual energy: 240 vs 244 kWh/yr. The Conserv FR300BG is larger at 3.1 cu ft versus 3 cu ft.
Capacity
| Spec | Arctic King | Conserv |
|---|---|---|
| Total Volume(cu ft) | 3 | 3.1 |
| Adjusted Volume(cu ft) | 5.3 | 5.4 |
Energy
| Spec | Arctic King | Conserv |
|---|---|---|
| Annual Energy Use(kWh/yr) | 240 | 244 |
| US Federal Standard(kWh/yr) | 272 | 272 |
| Better Than Standard(%) | 12 | 10 |
| Most Efficient | No | No |
Configuration
| Spec | Arctic King | Conserv |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Compact | Compact |
| Product Class | 16 - Compact upright freezers with manual defrost | 16 - Compact upright freezers with manual defrost |
| Defrost Type | Manual | Manual |
| Compact | Yes | Yes |
| Built In | No | No |
| Ice Maker | No | No |