Bosch WGA12400**vsWhirlpool WFW4090N**
Side-by-side washer comparison
Bosch WGA12400**
Tub Volume
2.1cu ft
IMEF
2.40cu ft/kWh
Annual Energy
70kWh/yr
Annual Water
2325gal/yr
Whirlpool WFW4090N**
Tub Volume
2cu ft
IMEF
2.07cu ft/kWh
Annual Energy
94kWh/yr
Annual Water
2503gal/yr
Key differences
Bosch WGA12400** is 14% more efficient at 2.40 cu ft/kWh versus 2.07 cu ft/kWh for the Whirlpool WFW4090N**. The Bosch WGA12400** is larger at 2.1 cu ft versus 2 cu ft.
Capacity
| Spec | Bosch | Whirlpool |
|---|---|---|
| Tub Volume(cu ft) | 2.10 | 2 |
| Width(in) | 23.5 | 26 |
Efficiency
| Spec | Bosch | Whirlpool |
|---|---|---|
| IMEF(cu ft/kWh) | 2.40 | 2.07 |
| US Federal Standard IMEF(cu ft/kWh) | 1.84 | 1.84 |
| IWF(gal/cu ft) | 3.7 | 4.2 |
| US Federal Standard IWF(gal/cu ft) | 4.7 | 4.7 |
| Most Efficient | No | No |
Consumption
| Spec | Bosch | Whirlpool |
|---|---|---|
| Annual Energy Use(kWh/yr) | 70 | 94 |
| Annual Water Use(gal/yr) | 2325 | 2503 |
Configuration
| Spec | Bosch | Whirlpool |
|---|---|---|
| Load Configuration | Front Load | Front Load |
| Intended Market | Residential | Residential |
| Connected | No | No |
| Paired Dryer Available | Yes | No |
| Additional Features | None | Anti-Wrinkle |