COSTWAY ES10429US-WHvsVellgoo TAURUS-RCS25(Y)-N4-3
Side-by-side dehumidifier comparison
COSTWAY ES10429US-WH
Water Removal
22.7pints/day
Efficiency
1.70L/kWh
Annual Energy
779kWh/yr
Refrigerant
HFC-32
GWP 675 · Lower
Vellgoo TAURUS-RCS25(Y)-N4-3
Water Removal
22.5pints/day
Efficiency
1.75L/kWh
Annual Energy
287kWh/yr
Refrigerant
HFC-32
GWP 675 · Lower
Key differences
Vellgoo TAURUS-RCS25(Y)-N4-3 is 3% more efficient at 1.75 L/kWh versus 1.70 L/kWh for the COSTWAY ES10429US-WH. The COSTWAY ES10429US-WH is larger at 22.7 pints/day versus 22.5 pints/day. Overall, the Vellgoo TAURUS-RCS25(Y)-N4-3 sits higher in the category, ranking above 12% of certified dehumidifiers.
Performance
| Spec | COSTWAY | Vellgoo |
|---|---|---|
| Water Removal Capacity(pints/day) | 22.7 | 22.5 |
| Integrated Energy Factor(L/kWh) | 1.70 | 1.75 |
| Annual Energy Consumption(kWh/yr) | 779 | 287 |
| Most Efficient | No | No |
Refrigerant
| Spec | COSTWAY | Vellgoo |
|---|---|---|
| Type | HFC-32 | HFC-32 |
| GWP Rating | HFC-32 (GWP:675 | Lower GWP) | HFC-32 (GWP:675 | Lower GWP) |
| Charge(oz) | 3.4 | 3.9 |
Configuration
| Spec | COSTWAY | Vellgoo |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Portable Dehumidifier | Portable Dehumidifier |
| Connected Capable | No | No |