COSTWAY ES10810US-WHvsJack&Rose DH02
Side-by-side dehumidifier comparison
COSTWAY ES10810US-WH
Water Removal
16pints/day
Efficiency
1.78L/kWh
Annual Energy
199kWh/yr
Type
Portable Dehumidifier
Jack&Rose DH02
Water Removal
16.1pints/day
Efficiency
1.90L/kWh
Annual Energy
182kWh/yr
Refrigerant
R290
Key differences
Jack&Rose DH02 is 6% more efficient at 1.90 L/kWh versus 1.78 L/kWh for the COSTWAY ES10810US-WH. The Jack&Rose DH02 is larger at 16.1 pints/day versus 16 pints/day.
Performance
| Spec | COSTWAY | Jack&Rose |
|---|---|---|
| Water Removal Capacity(pints/day) | 16 | 16.1 |
| Integrated Energy Factor(L/kWh) | 1.78 | 1.90 |
| Annual Energy Consumption(kWh/yr) | 199 | 182 |
| Most Efficient | No | Yes |
Refrigerant
| Spec | COSTWAY | Jack&Rose |
|---|---|---|
| Type | — | R290 |
| Charge(oz) | 2.8 | 2.1 |
Configuration
| Spec | COSTWAY | Jack&Rose |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Portable Dehumidifier | Portable Dehumidifier |
| Connected Capable | No | No |