Crosley CFWMH45125AWvsElectrolux ELFW7626***
Side-by-side washer comparison
Crosley CFWMH45125AW
Tub Volume
4.5cu ft
IMEF
2.76cu ft/kWh
Annual Energy
162kWh/yr
Annual Water
4248gal/yr
Electrolux ELFW7626***
Tub Volume
4.4cu ft
IMEF
2.92cu ft/kWh
Annual Energy
85kWh/yr
Annual Water
4135gal/yr
Key differences
Electrolux ELFW7626*** is 5% more efficient at 2.92 cu ft/kWh versus 2.76 cu ft/kWh for the Crosley CFWMH45125AW. The Crosley CFWMH45125AW is larger at 4.5 cu ft versus 4.4 cu ft.
Capacity
| Spec | Crosley | Electrolux |
|---|---|---|
| Tub Volume(cu ft) | 4.50 | 4.40 |
| Width(in) | 27.1 | 27 |
Efficiency
| Spec | Crosley | Electrolux |
|---|---|---|
| IMEF(cu ft/kWh) | 2.76 | 2.92 |
| US Federal Standard IMEF(cu ft/kWh) | 1.84 | 1.84 |
| IWF(gal/cu ft) | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| US Federal Standard IWF(gal/cu ft) | 4.7 | 4.7 |
| Most Efficient | No | No |
Consumption
| Spec | Crosley | Electrolux |
|---|---|---|
| Annual Energy Use(kWh/yr) | 162 | 85 |
| Annual Water Use(gal/yr) | 4248 | 4135 |
Configuration
| Spec | Crosley | Electrolux |
|---|---|---|
| Load Configuration | Front Load | Front Load |
| Intended Market | Residential | Residential |
| Connected | No | No |
| Paired Dryer Available | — | Yes |
| Additional Features | None | Delayed Start, Steam Cycle, Sanitize Option, Gentle Cycle |