Crosley ZWW5310R**vsLG WM9000H*A
Side-by-side washer comparison
Crosley ZWW5310R**
Tub Volume
5.3cu ft
IMEF
2.06cu ft/kWh
Annual Energy
260kWh/yr
Annual Water
6761gal/yr
LG WM9000H*A
Tub Volume
5.2cu ft
IMEF
2.92cu ft/kWh
Annual Energy
120kWh/yr
Annual Water
4880gal/yr
Key differences
LG WM9000H*A is 29% more efficient at 2.92 cu ft/kWh versus 2.06 cu ft/kWh for the Crosley ZWW5310R**. The Crosley ZWW5310R** is larger at 5.3 cu ft versus 5.2 cu ft. Overall, the LG WM9000H*A sits higher in the category, ranking above 76% of certified clothes washers.
Capacity
| Spec | Crosley | LG |
|---|---|---|
| Tub Volume(cu ft) | 5.30 | 5.20 |
| Width(in) | 27 | 29 |
Efficiency
| Spec | Crosley | LG |
|---|---|---|
| IMEF(cu ft/kWh) | 2.06 | 2.92 |
| US Federal Standard IMEF(cu ft/kWh) | 1.57 | 1.84 |
| IWF(gal/cu ft) | 4.3 | 3.2 |
| US Federal Standard IWF(gal/cu ft) | 6.5 | 4.7 |
| Most Efficient | No | No |
Consumption
| Spec | Crosley | LG |
|---|---|---|
| Annual Energy Use(kWh/yr) | 260 | 120 |
| Annual Water Use(gal/yr) | 6761 | 4880 |
Configuration
| Spec | Crosley | LG |
|---|---|---|
| Load Configuration | Top Load | Front Load |
| Intended Market | Residential | Residential |
| Connected | No | No |
| Paired Dryer Available | No | No |
| Additional Features | Gentle Cycle | Steam Cycle, Sanitize Option |