DREAME CVF39AvsGlowells PD82A
Side-by-side dehumidifier comparison
DREAME CVF39A
Water Removal
23.3pints/day
Efficiency
1.70L/kWh
Annual Energy
295kWh/yr
Refrigerant
HFC-32
GWP 675 · Lower
Glowells PD82A
Water Removal
23pints/day
Efficiency
1.75L/kWh
Annual Energy
276kWh/yr
Refrigerant
HFC-32
GWP 675 · Lower
Key differences
Glowells PD82A is 3% more efficient at 1.75 L/kWh versus 1.70 L/kWh for the DREAME CVF39A. The DREAME CVF39A is larger at 23.3 pints/day versus 23 pints/day. Overall, the Glowells PD82A sits higher in the category, ranking above 12% of certified dehumidifiers.
Performance
| Spec | DREAME | Glowells |
|---|---|---|
| Water Removal Capacity(pints/day) | 23.3 | 23 |
| Integrated Energy Factor(L/kWh) | 1.70 | 1.75 |
| Annual Energy Consumption(kWh/yr) | 295 | 276 |
| Most Efficient | No | No |
Refrigerant
| Spec | DREAME | Glowells |
|---|---|---|
| Type | HFC-32 | HFC-32 |
| GWP Rating | HFC-32 (GWP:675 | Lower GWP) | HFC-32 (GWP:675 | Lower GWP) |
| Charge(oz) | 3.9 | 4.2 |
Configuration
| Spec | DREAME | Glowells |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Portable Dehumidifier | Portable Dehumidifier |
| Connected Capable | No | No |