Fisher & Paykel RB36SvsZephyr PRRFD24C2AP
Side-by-side freezer comparison
Fisher & Paykel RB36S
Capacity
3.7cu ft
Annual Energy
300kWh/yr
Better Than Standard
28%
Most Efficient
Type
Compact
Zephyr PRRFD24C2AP
Capacity
3.9cu ft
Annual Energy
330kWh/yr
Better Than Standard
22%
Most Efficient
Type
Compact
Key differences
Fisher & Paykel RB36S is 9% more efficient at 300 kWh/yr versus 330 kWh/yr for the Zephyr PRRFD24C2AP. The Zephyr PRRFD24C2AP is larger at 3.9 cu ft versus 3.7 cu ft.
Capacity
| Spec | Fisher & Paykel | Zephyr |
|---|---|---|
| Total Volume(cu ft) | 3.7 | 3.9 |
| Adjusted Volume(cu ft) | 6.5 | 6.8 |
Energy
| Spec | Fisher & Paykel | Zephyr |
|---|---|---|
| Annual Energy Use(kWh/yr) | 300 | 330 |
| US Federal Standard(kWh/yr) | 418 | 421 |
| Better Than Standard(%) | 28 | 22 |
| Most Efficient | Yes | Yes |
Configuration
| Spec | Fisher & Paykel | Zephyr |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Compact | Compact |
| Product Class | 17 - Compact upright freezers with automatic defrost | 17 - Compact upright freezers with automatic defrost |
| Defrost Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Compact | Yes | Yes |
| Built In | No | No |
| Ice Maker | No | No |