Fotile SD2F-P5vsLoch L1126
Side-by-side dishwasher comparison
Fotile SD2F-P5
Place Settings
4
Annual Energy
155kWh/yr
Water Use
2gal/cycle
Type
Compact
Loch L1126
Place Settings
2
Annual Energy
80kWh/yr
Water Use
1gal/cycle
Type
Compact
Key differences
Loch L1126 is 48% more efficient at 80 kWh/yr versus 155 kWh/yr for the Fotile SD2F-P5. The Fotile SD2F-P5 is larger at 4 versus 2 .
Capacity
| Spec | Fotile | Loch |
|---|---|---|
| Place Settings | 4 | 2 |
| Width(in) | 17 | 10.3 |
| Depth(in) | 12.5 | 20.3 |
Energy & Water
| Spec | Fotile | Loch |
|---|---|---|
| Annual Energy Use(kWh/yr) | 155 | 80 |
| US Federal Standard(kWh/yr) | 222 | 222 |
| Better Than Standard(kWh/yr) | 30 | 64 |
| Water Use(gal/cycle) | 2 | 1 |
| Federal Standard Water(gal/cycle) | 3.50 | 3.50 |
| Most Efficient | No | No |
Configuration
| Spec | Fotile | Loch |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Compact | Compact |
| Tub Material | Stainless Steel | Hybrid (Plastic & Steel) |
| Soil Sensing | No | Yes |
| Drying Method | Heated Dry | None |
| Connected Capable | No | No |
| Additional Features | Top Controls | None |