Maytag MHW6630M**vsVesta VWSHongkong27WH
Side-by-side washer comparison
Maytag MHW6630M**
Tub Volume
4.8cu ft
IMEF
2.92cu ft/kWh
Annual Energy
99kWh/yr
Annual Water
4541gal/yr
Vesta VWSHongkong27WH
Tub Volume
4.6cu ft
IMEF
2.76cu ft/kWh
Annual Energy
110kWh/yr
Annual Water
4305gal/yr
Key differences
Maytag MHW6630M** is 5% more efficient at 2.92 cu ft/kWh versus 2.76 cu ft/kWh for the Vesta VWSHongkong27WH. The Maytag MHW6630M** is larger at 4.8 cu ft versus 4.6 cu ft.
Capacity
| Spec | Maytag | Vesta |
|---|---|---|
| Tub Volume(cu ft) | 4.80 | 4.60 |
| Width(in) | 27 | 27 |
Efficiency
| Spec | Maytag | Vesta |
|---|---|---|
| IMEF(cu ft/kWh) | 2.92 | 2.76 |
| US Federal Standard IMEF(cu ft/kWh) | 1.84 | 1.84 |
| IWF(gal/cu ft) | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| US Federal Standard IWF(gal/cu ft) | 4.7 | 4.7 |
| Most Efficient | No | No |
Consumption
| Spec | Maytag | Vesta |
|---|---|---|
| Annual Energy Use(kWh/yr) | 99 | 110 |
| Annual Water Use(gal/yr) | 4541 | 4305 |
Configuration
| Spec | Maytag | Vesta |
|---|---|---|
| Load Configuration | Front Load | Front Load |
| Intended Market | Residential | Residential |
| Connected | No | No |
| Paired Dryer Available | Yes | — |
| Additional Features | Anti-Wrinkle | None |