MOISWELL Defender MP145vsZAFRO D026W-50Pt3M
Side-by-side dehumidifier comparison
MOISWELL Defender MP145
Water Removal
49.8pints/day
Efficiency
2.02L/kWh
Annual Energy
530kWh/yr
Refrigerant
HFC-32
GWP 675 · Lower
ZAFRO D026W-50Pt3M
Water Removal
49.9pints/day
Efficiency
2.20L/kWh
Annual Energy
504kWh/yr
Refrigerant
HFC-32
GWP 675 · Lower
Key differences
ZAFRO D026W-50Pt3M is 8% more efficient at 2.20 L/kWh versus 2.02 L/kWh for the MOISWELL Defender MP145. The ZAFRO D026W-50Pt3M is larger at 49.9 pints/day versus 49.8 pints/day. Overall, the ZAFRO D026W-50Pt3M sits higher in the category, ranking above 95% of certified dehumidifiers.
Performance
| Spec | MOISWELL | ZAFRO |
|---|---|---|
| Water Removal Capacity(pints/day) | 49.8 | 49.9 |
| Integrated Energy Factor(L/kWh) | 2.02 | 2.20 |
| Annual Energy Consumption(kWh/yr) | 530 | 504 |
| Most Efficient | No | Yes |
Refrigerant
| Spec | MOISWELL | ZAFRO |
|---|---|---|
| Type | HFC-32 | HFC-32 |
| GWP Rating | HFC-32 (GWP:675 | Lower GWP) | HFC-32 (GWP:675 | Lower GWP) |
| Charge(oz) | 10.4 | 5.4 |
Configuration
| Spec | MOISWELL | ZAFRO |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Portable Dehumidifier | Portable Dehumidifier |
| Connected Capable | No | No |