SpecDirectory

Carrier GBA42V/H**N******1vsWaterFurnace NSW040*1

Side-by-side geothermal heat pump comparison

Carrier GBA42V/H**N******1

EER

19.5–23.5BTU/Wh

COP

3.90–4.40

Refrigerant

Other

Rated Across

2loop types

WaterFurnace NSW040*1

EER

17.5–23.4BTU/Wh

COP

3.10–3.90

Refrigerant

R-410A

Rated Across

2loop types

Key differences

Both models are closely matched on eer: 23.5 vs 23.4 BTU/Wh. The Carrier GBA42V/H**N******1 is larger at 23.5 BTU/Wh versus 23.4 BTU/Wh.

Efficiency

SpecCarrierWaterFurnace
EER (best configuration)(BTU/Wh)23.523.4
EER (worst configuration)(BTU/Wh)19.517.5
COP (best configuration)4.403.90
COP (worst configuration)3.903.10

Configuration

SpecCarrierWaterFurnace
Loop Types Rated22
Total Configurations Rated22
Model NameGBA5 SERIES
RefrigerantOtherR-410A
View GBA42V/H**N******1 specs →View NSW040*1 specs →

More comparisons

5 SERIES INDOOR SPLITS NSZ060H1vs Carrier GBA42V/H**N******1AE Air WSH6060A6*vs WaterFurnace NSW040*1Arcoaire HBR42V/H**C******1vs WaterFurnace NSW040*1Arcoaire HBR42V/H**N******1vs WaterFurnace NSW040*1