CONFORTO CH-499vsPeerless PFC-460-NAT
Side-by-side commercial boiler comparison
CONFORTO CH-499
Thermal Efficiency
95.6%
Input Rate
470MBTU/hr
Turndown Ratio
5.00
Application
Indoor
Peerless PFC-460-NAT
Thermal Efficiency
95.2%
Input Rate
460MBTU/hr
Turndown Ratio
5.00
Application
Indoor
Key differences
Both models are closely matched on thermal eff: 95.6 vs 95.2 %. The CONFORTO CH-499 is larger at 470 MBTU/hr versus 460 MBTU/hr.
Performance
| Spec | CONFORTO | Peerless |
|---|---|---|
| Thermal Efficiency(%) | 95.6 | 95.2 |
| Full-Load Input Rate(MBTU/hr) | 470 | 460 |
| Turndown Ratio | 5.00 | 5.00 |
Configuration
| Spec | CONFORTO | Peerless |
|---|---|---|
| Application | Indoor | Indoor |
| Control Type | Multi-stage | Multi-stage |
| Model Name | CH-499 | PureFire |