GeoComfort GZS030vsYork Y3A(V/H)024BD1**1
Side-by-side geothermal heat pump comparison
GeoComfort GZS030
EER
17.7–23.4BTU/Wh
COP
3.60–4.50
Refrigerant
R-410A
Rated Across
2loop types
York Y3A(V/H)024BD1**1
EER
18.5–23.3BTU/Wh
COP
4.20–4.70
Refrigerant
Other
Rated Across
2loop types
Key differences
Both models are closely matched on eer: 23.4 vs 23.3 BTU/Wh. The GeoComfort GZS030 is larger at 23.4 BTU/Wh versus 23.3 BTU/Wh.
Efficiency
| Spec | GeoComfort | York |
|---|---|---|
| EER (best configuration)(BTU/Wh) | 23.4 | 23.3 |
| EER (worst configuration)(BTU/Wh) | 17.7 | 18.5 |
| COP (best configuration) | 4.50 | 4.70 |
| COP (worst configuration) | 3.60 | 4.20 |
Configuration
| Spec | GeoComfort | York |
|---|---|---|
| Loop Types Rated | 2 | 2 |
| Total Configurations Rated | 2 | 2 |
| Model Name | Ion | LX Series |
| Refrigerant | R-410A | Other |