ADS DASLvsAuto-Chlor A6
Side-by-side dishwasher comparison
ADS DASL
Throughput
72racks/hr
Water Use
0.99gal/rack
Idle Rate (Low Temp)
0kW
Sanitation
Chemical Sanitizing Machine
Auto-Chlor A6
Throughput
69racks/hr
Water Use
0.73gal/rack
Idle Rate (Low Temp)
0.23kW
Sanitation
Dual Sanitizing Machine
Key differences
Auto-Chlor A6 is 26% more efficient at 0.73 gal/rack versus 0.99 gal/rack for the ADS DASL. The ADS DASL is larger at 72 racks/hr versus 69 racks/hr.
Throughput
| Spec | ADS | Auto-Chlor |
|---|---|---|
| Racks per Hour(racks/hr) | 72 | 69 |
Water Use
| Spec | ADS | Auto-Chlor |
|---|---|---|
| Per Rack(gal) | 0.99 | 0.73 |
Energy
| Spec | ADS | Auto-Chlor |
|---|---|---|
| Idle Rate (Low Temp)(kW) | 0 | 0.23 |
| Idle Rate (High Temp)(kW) | — | 0.42 |
| Booster Heater Idle Rate(kW) | — | 0.17 |
| Washing Energy (Low Temp)(kWh/rack) | 0.010 | 0.100 |
| Washing Energy (High Temp)(kWh/rack) | — | 0.240 |
| Energy Saver Mode | No | Yes |
| Energy Saver Idle Rate(kW) | — | 0.42 |
Configuration
| Spec | ADS | Auto-Chlor |
|---|---|---|
| Machine Type | Stationary Single Tank Door - Dump and Fill | Stationary Single Tank Door |
| Sanitation Method | Chemical Sanitizing (Low Temp) Machine | Dual Sanitizing Machine |
| Inseparable Booster Heater | — | No |
| Heat Recovery | No | No |
| Hot Water Offset Claimed | No | No |