Alto-Shaam 1200-SvsATOSA ATHC-9ES
Side-by-side holding cabinet comparison
Alto-Shaam 1200-S
Internal Volume
9.4cu ft
Max Idle Rate
202W
Energy Usage
173W
Doors
1
ATOSA ATHC-9ES
Internal Volume
9.2cu ft
Max Idle Rate
198W
Energy Usage
191W
Doors
1
Key differences
Both models are closely matched on idle: 202 vs 198 W. The Alto-Shaam 1200-S is larger at 9.4 cu ft versus 9.2 cu ft.
Capacity
| Spec | Alto-Shaam | ATOSA |
|---|---|---|
| Internal Volume(cu ft) | 9.4 | 9.2 |
| Doors | 1 | 1 |
| Door / Wall Type | Transparent | Transparent |
Energy
| Spec | Alto-Shaam | ATOSA |
|---|---|---|
| Energy Usage(W) | 173 | 191 |
| Maximum Idle Rate(W) | 202 | 198 |