ATOSA ATHC-9ESvsHatco FSHC-7W2-EE
Side-by-side holding cabinet comparison
ATOSA ATHC-9ES
Internal Volume
9.2cu ft
Max Idle Rate
198W
Energy Usage
191W
Doors
1
Hatco FSHC-7W2-EE
Internal Volume
8.6cu ft
Max Idle Rate
21W
Energy Usage
171W
Doors
2
Key differences
Hatco FSHC-7W2-EE is 89% more efficient at 21 W versus 198 W for the ATOSA ATHC-9ES. The ATOSA ATHC-9ES is larger at 9.2 cu ft versus 8.6 cu ft. Overall, the ATOSA ATHC-9ES sits higher in the category, ranking above 14% of certified commercial hot food holding cabinets.
Capacity
| Spec | ATOSA | Hatco |
|---|---|---|
| Internal Volume(cu ft) | 9.2 | 8.6 |
| Doors | 1 | 2 |
| Door / Wall Type | Transparent | Solid |
Energy
| Spec | ATOSA | Hatco |
|---|---|---|
| Energy Usage(W) | 191 | 171 |
| Maximum Idle Rate(W) | 198 | 21 |