ATOSA HD350-AP-161vsFollett MCD425A
Side-by-side ice machine comparison
ATOSA HD350-AP-161
Harvest Rate
352lb/day
Energy Use
5.87kWh/100 lb
Water Use
15.1gal/100 lb
Refrigerant
R-290
GWP 3 · Lower
Follett MCD425A
Harvest Rate
351lb/day
Energy Use
6.06kWh/100 lb
Water Use
12gal/100 lb
Refrigerant
R-404A
GWP 3920 · Higher
Key differences
ATOSA HD350-AP-161 is 3% more efficient at 5.87 kWh/100 lb versus 6.06 kWh/100 lb for the Follett MCD425A. The ATOSA HD350-AP-161 is larger at 352 lb/day versus 351 lb/day. ATOSA HD350-AP-161 uses a lower-impact refrigerant: R-290 (GWP 3) versus R-404A (GWP 3920).
Production
| Spec | ATOSA | Follett |
|---|---|---|
| Harvest Rate(lb/day) | 352 | 351 |
| Ice Type | Batch | Continuous |
| Equipment Type | Self Contained Unit | Ice Making Head |
| Ice Hardness Factor | 0 | 84 |
Efficiency
| Spec | ATOSA | Follett |
|---|---|---|
| Energy Use(kWh/100 lb) | 5.87 | 6.06 |
| Potable Water Use(gal/100 lb) | 15.1 | 12 |
Refrigerant
| Spec | ATOSA | Follett |
|---|---|---|
| Type | R-290 | R-404A |
| GWP Rating | R-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP) | R-404A (GWP:3920) |
Connectivity
| Spec | ATOSA | Follett |
|---|---|---|
| Connected | No | No |