ATOSA MGF8452GRvsCriotec CT-4 HC
Side-by-side refrigerator comparison
ATOSA MGF8452GR
Total Volume
4.1cu ft
Daily Energy
1.38kWh/day
Refrigerant
R-290
GWP 3 · Lower
Dimensions
60.5 × 33 × 26.6in
Criotec CT-4 HC
Total Volume
4.2cu ft
Daily Energy
0.77kWh/day
Refrigerant
R-290
GWP 3 · Lower
Dimensions
15.1 × 12.4 × 37.5in
Key differences
Criotec CT-4 HC is 44% more efficient at 0.77 kWh/day versus 1.38 kWh/day for the ATOSA MGF8452GR. The Criotec CT-4 HC is larger at 4.2 cu ft versus 4.1 cu ft.
Dimensions
| Spec | ATOSA | Criotec |
|---|---|---|
| Height(in) | 26.60 | 37.50 |
| Width(in) | 60.50 | 15.10 |
| Depth(in) | 33 | 12.40 |
Capacity
| Spec | ATOSA | Criotec |
|---|---|---|
| Total Volume(cu ft) | 4.1 | 4.2 |
| Display Area(sq ft) | 0 | 0 |
| Doors | 0 | 1 |
| Transparent Doors | 0 | 1 |
| Solid Doors | 0 | 0 |
| Drawers | 2 | 0 |
| Door Orientation | Drawer | Hinged |
Efficiency
| Spec | ATOSA | Criotec |
|---|---|---|
| Daily Energy Consumption(kWh/day) | 1.38 | 0.77 |
| Defrost Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Refrigerant
| Spec | ATOSA | Criotec |
|---|---|---|
| Type | R-290 | R-290 |
| GWP Rating | R-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP) | R-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP) |
Classification
| Spec | ATOSA | Criotec |
|---|---|---|
| Product Type | Chef Base Refrigerator | Vertical Transparent Door Refrigerator |
| Orientation | Chest | Vertical |
| Description | Chef Base | Merchandiser |