ATOSA YR140-AP-161vsHoshizaki KM-116BAJ
Side-by-side ice machine comparison
ATOSA YR140-AP-161
Harvest Rate
101lb/day
Energy Use
7.20kWh/100 lb
Water Use
14.3gal/100 lb
Refrigerant
R-290
GWP 3 · Lower
Hoshizaki KM-116BAJ
Harvest Rate
100lb/day
Energy Use
8.10kWh/100 lb
Water Use
20gal/100 lb
Refrigerant
R-134a
GWP 1430 · Higher
Key differences
ATOSA YR140-AP-161 is 11% more efficient at 7.20 kWh/100 lb versus 8.10 kWh/100 lb for the Hoshizaki KM-116BAJ. The ATOSA YR140-AP-161 is larger at 101 lb/day versus 100 lb/day. ATOSA YR140-AP-161 uses a lower-impact refrigerant: R-290 (GWP 3) versus R-134a (GWP 1430). Overall, the Hoshizaki KM-116BAJ sits higher in the category, ranking above 80% of certified commercial ice machines.
Production
| Spec | ATOSA | Hoshizaki |
|---|---|---|
| Harvest Rate(lb/day) | 101 | 100 |
| Ice Type | Batch | Batch |
| Equipment Type | Self Contained Unit | Self Contained Unit |
| Ice Hardness Factor | 0 | 100 |
Efficiency
| Spec | ATOSA | Hoshizaki |
|---|---|---|
| Energy Use(kWh/100 lb) | 7.20 | 8.10 |
| Potable Water Use(gal/100 lb) | 14.3 | 20 |
Refrigerant
| Spec | ATOSA | Hoshizaki |
|---|---|---|
| Type | R-290 | R-134a |
| GWP Rating | R-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP) | R-134a (GWP:1430) |
Connectivity
| Spec | ATOSA | Hoshizaki |
|---|---|---|
| Connected | No | No |