ATOSA YR280-AP-161vsIce-O-Matic CIM0320*A90
Side-by-side ice machine comparison
ATOSA YR280-AP-161
Harvest Rate
236lb/day
Energy Use
6.10kWh/100 lb
Water Use
15.3gal/100 lb
Refrigerant
R-290
GWP 3 · Lower
Ice-O-Matic CIM0320*A90
Harvest Rate
240lb/day
Energy Use
6.40kWh/100 lb
Water Use
19gal/100 lb
Refrigerant
R-290
GWP 3 · Lower
Key differences
ATOSA YR280-AP-161 is 5% more efficient at 6.10 kWh/100 lb versus 6.40 kWh/100 lb for the Ice-O-Matic CIM0320*A90. The Ice-O-Matic CIM0320*A90 is larger at 240 lb/day versus 236 lb/day.
Production
| Spec | ATOSA | Ice-O-Matic |
|---|---|---|
| Harvest Rate(lb/day) | 236 | 240 |
| Ice Type | Batch | Batch |
| Equipment Type | Self Contained Unit | Ice Making Head |
| Ice Hardness Factor | 0 | 100 |
Efficiency
| Spec | ATOSA | Ice-O-Matic |
|---|---|---|
| Energy Use(kWh/100 lb) | 6.10 | 6.40 |
| Potable Water Use(gal/100 lb) | 15.3 | 19 |
Refrigerant
| Spec | ATOSA | Ice-O-Matic |
|---|---|---|
| Type | R-290 | R-290 |
| GWP Rating | R-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP) | R-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP) |
Connectivity
| Spec | ATOSA | Ice-O-Matic |
|---|---|---|
| Connected | No | No |