ATOSA YR450-AP-161vsHoshizaki KM-322MAK
Side-by-side ice machine comparison
ATOSA YR450-AP-161
Harvest Rate
403lb/day
Energy Use
5.10kWh/100 lb
Water Use
15.8gal/100 lb
Refrigerant
R-290
GWP 3 · Lower
Hoshizaki KM-322MAK
Harvest Rate
400lb/day
Energy Use
4.90kWh/100 lb
Water Use
18gal/100 lb
Refrigerant
R-290
GWP 3 · Lower
Key differences
Hoshizaki KM-322MAK is 4% more efficient at 4.90 kWh/100 lb versus 5.10 kWh/100 lb for the ATOSA YR450-AP-161. The ATOSA YR450-AP-161 is larger at 403 lb/day versus 400 lb/day.
Production
| Spec | ATOSA | Hoshizaki |
|---|---|---|
| Harvest Rate(lb/day) | 403 | 400 |
| Ice Type | Batch | Batch |
| Equipment Type | Ice Making Head | Ice Making Head |
| Ice Hardness Factor | 0 | 100 |
Efficiency
| Spec | ATOSA | Hoshizaki |
|---|---|---|
| Energy Use(kWh/100 lb) | 5.10 | 4.90 |
| Potable Water Use(gal/100 lb) | 15.8 | 18 |
Refrigerant
| Spec | ATOSA | Hoshizaki |
|---|---|---|
| Type | R-290 | R-290 |
| GWP Rating | R-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP) | R-290 (GWP:3 | Lower GWP) |
Connectivity
| Spec | ATOSA | Hoshizaki |
|---|---|---|
| Connected | No | No |