Auto-Chlor 44R3vsStero ER-94S
Side-by-side dishwasher comparison
Auto-Chlor 44R3
Throughput
233racks/hr
Water Use
0.37gal/rack
Idle Rate (Low Temp)
0.44kW
Sanitation
Dual Sanitizing Machine
Stero ER-94S
Throughput
268racks/hr
Water Use
0.45gal/rack
Idle Rate (High Temp)
1.79kW
Sanitation
Hot Water Sanitizing Machine
Key differences
Auto-Chlor 44R3 is 18% more efficient at 0.37 gal/rack versus 0.45 gal/rack for the Stero ER-94S. The Stero ER-94S is larger at 268 racks/hr versus 233 racks/hr.
Throughput
| Spec | Auto-Chlor | Stero |
|---|---|---|
| Racks per Hour(racks/hr) | 233 | 268 |
Water Use
| Spec | Auto-Chlor | Stero |
|---|---|---|
| Per Rack(gal) | 0.37 | 0.45 |
Energy
| Spec | Auto-Chlor | Stero |
|---|---|---|
| Idle Rate (Low Temp)(kW) | 0.44 | — |
| Idle Rate (High Temp)(kW) | 0.95 | 1.79 |
| Booster Heater Idle Rate(kW) | 0.06 | 0.14 |
| Washing Energy (Low Temp)(kWh/rack) | 0.100 | — |
| Washing Energy (High Temp)(kWh/rack) | 0.310 | 0.350 |
| Energy Saver Mode | No | No |
Configuration
| Spec | Auto-Chlor | Stero |
|---|---|---|
| Machine Type | Multiple Tank Rack Conveyor | Multiple Tank Rack Conveyor |
| Sanitation Method | Dual Sanitizing Machine | Hot Water Sanitizing (High Temp) Machine |
| Heat Recovery | No | No |
| Hot Water Offset Claimed | No | No |