Auto-Chlor ACvsChemical Methods EST-EXT
Side-by-side dishwasher comparison
Auto-Chlor AC
Throughput
30racks/hr
Water Use
1.04gal/rack
Idle Rate (Low Temp)
0kW
Sanitation
Chemical Sanitizing Machine
Chemical Methods EST-EXT
Water Use
1.10gal/rack
Sanitation
Chemical Sanitizing Machine
Machine Type
Stationary Single Tank Door - Dump and Fill
Key differences
Auto-Chlor AC is 5% more efficient at 1.04 gal/rack versus 1.10 gal/rack for the Chemical Methods EST-EXT.
Throughput
| Spec | Auto-Chlor | Chemical Methods |
|---|---|---|
| Racks per Hour(racks/hr) | 30 | — |
Water Use
| Spec | Auto-Chlor | Chemical Methods |
|---|---|---|
| Per Rack(gal) | 1.04 | 1.10 |
Energy
| Spec | Auto-Chlor | Chemical Methods |
|---|---|---|
| Idle Rate (Low Temp)(kW) | 0 | — |
| Washing Energy (Low Temp)(kWh/rack) | 0.020 | 0.030 |
| Energy Saver Mode | No | No |
Configuration
| Spec | Auto-Chlor | Chemical Methods |
|---|---|---|
| Machine Type | Under Counter - Glasswasher | Stationary Single Tank Door - Dump and Fill |
| Sanitation Method | Chemical Sanitizing (Low Temp) Machine | Chemical Sanitizing (Low Temp) Machine |
| Heat Recovery | No | No |
| Hot Water Offset Claimed | No | No |