Auto-Chlor ACvsHobart CL64-BAS
Side-by-side dishwasher comparison
Auto-Chlor AC
Throughput
30racks/hr
Water Use
1.04gal/rack
Idle Rate (Low Temp)
0kW
Sanitation
Chemical Sanitizing Machine
Hobart CL64-BAS
Water Use
0.36gal/rack
Idle Rate (Low Temp)
0.89kW
Sanitation
Dual Sanitizing Machine
Machine Type
Multiple Tank Rack Conveyor
Key differences
Hobart CL64-BAS is 65% more efficient at 0.36 gal/rack versus 1.04 gal/rack for the Auto-Chlor AC. Overall, the Auto-Chlor AC sits higher in the category, ranking above 89% of certified commercial dishwashers.
Throughput
| Spec | Auto-Chlor | Hobart |
|---|---|---|
| Racks per Hour(racks/hr) | 30 | — |
Water Use
| Spec | Auto-Chlor | Hobart |
|---|---|---|
| Per Rack(gal) | 1.04 | 0.36 |
Energy
| Spec | Auto-Chlor | Hobart |
|---|---|---|
| Idle Rate (Low Temp)(kW) | 0 | 0.89 |
| Idle Rate (High Temp)(kW) | — | 1.79 |
| Booster Heater Idle Rate(kW) | — | 0.10 |
| Washing Energy (Low Temp)(kWh/rack) | 0.020 | 0.180 |
| Washing Energy (High Temp)(kWh/rack) | — | 0.340 |
| Energy Saver Mode | No | No |
Configuration
| Spec | Auto-Chlor | Hobart |
|---|---|---|
| Machine Type | Under Counter - Glasswasher | Multiple Tank Rack Conveyor |
| Sanitation Method | Chemical Sanitizing (Low Temp) Machine | Dual Sanitizing Machine |
| Inseparable Booster Heater | — | No |
| Heat Recovery | No | No |
| Hot Water Offset Claimed | No | No |