Auto-Chlor ACvsHobart CL64eN
Side-by-side dishwasher comparison
Auto-Chlor AC
Throughput
30racks/hr
Water Use
1.04gal/rack
Idle Rate (Low Temp)
0kW
Sanitation
Chemical Sanitizing Machine
Hobart CL64eN
Water Use
0.39gal/rack
Idle Rate (Low Temp)
0.9kW
Sanitation
Dual Sanitizing Machine
Machine Type
Multiple Tank Rack Conveyor
Key differences
Hobart CL64eN is 63% more efficient at 0.39 gal/rack versus 1.04 gal/rack for the Auto-Chlor AC. Overall, the Auto-Chlor AC sits higher in the category, ranking above 89% of certified commercial dishwashers.
Throughput
| Spec | Auto-Chlor | Hobart |
|---|---|---|
| Racks per Hour(racks/hr) | 30 | — |
Water Use
| Spec | Auto-Chlor | Hobart |
|---|---|---|
| Per Rack(gal) | 1.04 | 0.39 |
Energy
| Spec | Auto-Chlor | Hobart |
|---|---|---|
| Idle Rate (Low Temp)(kW) | 0 | 0.90 |
| Idle Rate (High Temp)(kW) | — | 1.59 |
| Booster Heater Idle Rate(kW) | — | 0.16 |
| Washing Energy (Low Temp)(kWh/rack) | 0.020 | 0.200 |
| Washing Energy (High Temp)(kWh/rack) | — | 0.340 |
| Energy Saver Mode | No | Yes |
| Energy Saver Idle Rate(kW) | — | 0.82 |
Configuration
| Spec | Auto-Chlor | Hobart |
|---|---|---|
| Machine Type | Under Counter - Glasswasher | Multiple Tank Rack Conveyor |
| Sanitation Method | Chemical Sanitizing (Low Temp) Machine | Dual Sanitizing Machine |
| Heat Recovery | No | No |
| Hot Water Offset Claimed | No | No |