Auto-Chlor ACvsHobart EDL
Side-by-side dishwasher comparison
Auto-Chlor AC
Throughput
30racks/hr
Water Use
1.04gal/rack
Idle Rate (Low Temp)
0kW
Sanitation
Chemical Sanitizing Machine
Hobart EDL
Water Use
0.89gal/rack
Idle Rate (Low Temp)
0.24kW
Sanitation
Chemical Sanitizing Machine
Machine Type
Stationary Single Tank Door
Key differences
Hobart EDL is 14% more efficient at 0.89 gal/rack versus 1.04 gal/rack for the Auto-Chlor AC.
Throughput
| Spec | Auto-Chlor | Hobart |
|---|---|---|
| Racks per Hour(racks/hr) | 30 | — |
Water Use
| Spec | Auto-Chlor | Hobart |
|---|---|---|
| Per Rack(gal) | 1.04 | 0.89 |
Energy
| Spec | Auto-Chlor | Hobart |
|---|---|---|
| Idle Rate (Low Temp)(kW) | 0 | 0.24 |
| Washing Energy (Low Temp)(kWh/rack) | 0.020 | 0.120 |
| Energy Saver Mode | No | No |
Configuration
| Spec | Auto-Chlor | Hobart |
|---|---|---|
| Machine Type | Under Counter - Glasswasher | Stationary Single Tank Door |
| Sanitation Method | Chemical Sanitizing (Low Temp) Machine | Chemical Sanitizing (Low Temp) Machine |
| Heat Recovery | No | No |
| Hot Water Offset Claimed | No | No |