Auto-Chlor ACvsLamber F99EKDPS
Side-by-side dishwasher comparison
Auto-Chlor AC
Throughput
30racks/hr
Water Use
1.04gal/rack
Idle Rate (Low Temp)
0kW
Sanitation
Chemical Sanitizing Machine
Lamber F99EKDPS
Water Use
0.71gal/rack
Idle Rate (High Temp)
0.29kW
Sanitation
Hot Water Sanitizing Machine
Machine Type
Under Counter - Glasswasher
Key differences
Lamber F99EKDPS is 32% more efficient at 0.71 gal/rack versus 1.04 gal/rack for the Auto-Chlor AC. Overall, the Auto-Chlor AC sits higher in the category, ranking above 89% of certified commercial dishwashers.
Throughput
| Spec | Auto-Chlor | Lamber |
|---|---|---|
| Racks per Hour(racks/hr) | 30 | — |
Water Use
| Spec | Auto-Chlor | Lamber |
|---|---|---|
| Per Rack(gal) | 1.04 | 0.71 |
Energy
| Spec | Auto-Chlor | Lamber |
|---|---|---|
| Idle Rate (Low Temp)(kW) | 0 | — |
| Idle Rate (High Temp)(kW) | — | 0.29 |
| Booster Heater Idle Rate(kW) | — | 0.02 |
| Washing Energy (Low Temp)(kWh/rack) | 0.020 | — |
| Washing Energy (High Temp)(kWh/rack) | — | 0.180 |
| Energy Saver Mode | No | No |
Configuration
| Spec | Auto-Chlor | Lamber |
|---|---|---|
| Machine Type | Under Counter - Glasswasher | Under Counter - Glasswasher |
| Sanitation Method | Chemical Sanitizing (Low Temp) Machine | Hot Water Sanitizing (High Temp) Machine |
| Heat Recovery | No | No |
| Hot Water Offset Claimed | No | No |