Auto-Chlor ACBvsHobart CDH
Side-by-side dishwasher comparison
Auto-Chlor ACB
Throughput
30racks/hr
Water Use
1.03gal/rack
Idle Rate (Low Temp)
0.13kW
Sanitation
Chemical Sanitizing Machine
Hobart CDH
Throughput
31racks/hr
Water Use
0.73gal/rack
Idle Rate (High Temp)
0.42kW
Sanitation
Hot Water Sanitizing Machine
Key differences
Hobart CDH is 29% more efficient at 0.73 gal/rack versus 1.03 gal/rack for the Auto-Chlor ACB. The Hobart CDH is larger at 31 racks/hr versus 30 racks/hr. Overall, the Auto-Chlor ACB sits higher in the category, ranking above 88% of certified commercial dishwashers.
Throughput
| Spec | Auto-Chlor | Hobart |
|---|---|---|
| Racks per Hour(racks/hr) | 30 | 31 |
Water Use
| Spec | Auto-Chlor | Hobart |
|---|---|---|
| Per Rack(gal) | 1.03 | 0.73 |
Energy
| Spec | Auto-Chlor | Hobart |
|---|---|---|
| Idle Rate (Low Temp)(kW) | 0.13 | — |
| Idle Rate (High Temp)(kW) | — | 0.42 |
| Booster Heater Idle Rate(kW) | 0.14 | 0.88 |
| Washing Energy (Low Temp)(kWh/rack) | 0.030 | — |
| Washing Energy (High Temp)(kWh/rack) | — | 0.280 |
| Energy Saver Mode | Yes | No |
| Energy Saver Idle Rate(kW) | 0.13 | — |
Configuration
| Spec | Auto-Chlor | Hobart |
|---|---|---|
| Machine Type | Stationary Single Tank Door - Dump and Fill | Stationary Single Tank Door |
| Sanitation Method | Chemical Sanitizing (Low Temp) Machine | Hot Water Sanitizing (High Temp) Machine |
| Inseparable Booster Heater | No | — |
| Heat Recovery | No | No |
| Hot Water Offset Claimed | No | No |