Blodgett Hybrid 10 1/1vsCPG 351FGCD100N
Side-by-side oven comparison
Blodgett Hybrid 10 1/1
Cooking Efficiency
78%
Production
84lb/hr
Sheet Pans
10
Fuel
Electric
CPG 351FGCD100N
Cooking Efficiency
66%
Production
85lb/hr
Sheet Pans
5
Fuel
Gas
Key differences
Blodgett Hybrid 10 1/1 is 15% more efficient at 78.0 % versus 66.0 % for the CPG 351FGCD100N. The CPG 351FGCD100N is larger at 84.8 lb/hr versus 84 lb/hr.
Convection Mode
| Spec | Blodgett | CPG |
|---|---|---|
| Cooking Efficiency(%) | 78 | 66 |
| Production Capacity(lb/hr) | 84 | 85 |
| Preheat Time(min) | 4 | 12 |
| Preheat Energy(kWh) | 1 | — |
| Idle Rate(kW) | 1.01 | — |
| Idle Rate (Gas)(BTU/hr) | — | 6453 |
| Water per Pan(gal) | 0.01 | 0 |
Steam Mode
| Spec | Blodgett | CPG |
|---|---|---|
| Cooking Efficiency(%) | 59 | — |
| Production Capacity(lb/hr) | 114 | — |
| Preheat Time(min) | 7 | — |
| Preheat Energy(kWh) | 1 | — |
| Idle Rate(kW) | 0.83 | — |
| Steam Generation | Boiler/Steam Generator | Boiler-less/Spritzer/Injector |
| Water per Pan(gal) | 0.11 | — |
Capacity
| Spec | Blodgett | CPG |
|---|---|---|
| Size | — | Full-size |
| Full-Size Sheet Pans | 10 | 5 |
| Steam Pans | 10 | — |
Configuration
| Spec | Blodgett | CPG |
|---|---|---|
| Product Type | Combination | Convection |
| Classification | Type I - Table, countertop, and stand mounted units | Type I - Table, countertop, and stand mounted units |
| Fuel Type | Electric | Gas |
| Input Rate(kW) | 19.3 | — |
| Input Rate (Gas)(BTU/hr) | — | 50000 |