Cambro CMBH1826LvsCambro PCU1000HH615
Side-by-side holding cabinet comparison
Cambro CMBH1826L
Internal Volume
8cu ft
Max Idle Rate
172W
Energy Usage
76W
Doors
1
Cambro PCU1000HH615
Internal Volume
8.1cu ft
Max Idle Rate
174W
Energy Usage
115W
Doors
2
Key differences
Both models are closely matched on idle: 172 vs 174 W. The Cambro PCU1000HH615 is larger at 8.1 cu ft versus 8 cu ft.
Capacity
| Spec | Cambro | Cambro |
|---|---|---|
| Internal Volume(cu ft) | 8 | 8.1 |
| Doors | 1 | 2 |
| Door / Wall Type | Solid | Solid |
Energy
| Spec | Cambro | Cambro |
|---|---|---|
| Energy Usage(W) | 76 | 115 |
| Maximum Idle Rate(W) | 172 | 174 |