Alto-Shaam 1000-S/SRvsCambro CMBH1826L
Side-by-side holding cabinet comparison
Alto-Shaam 1000-S/SR
Internal Volume
7.8cu ft
Max Idle Rate
167W
Energy Usage
147W
Doors
1
Cambro CMBH1826L
Internal Volume
8cu ft
Max Idle Rate
172W
Energy Usage
76W
Doors
1
Key differences
Alto-Shaam 1000-S/SR is 3% more efficient at 167 W versus 172 W for the Cambro CMBH1826L. The Cambro CMBH1826L is larger at 8 cu ft versus 7.8 cu ft.
Capacity
| Spec | Alto-Shaam | Cambro |
|---|---|---|
| Internal Volume(cu ft) | 7.8 | 8 |
| Doors | 1 | 1 |
| Door / Wall Type | Transparent | Solid |
Energy
| Spec | Alto-Shaam | Cambro |
|---|---|---|
| Energy Usage(W) | 147 | 76 |
| Maximum Idle Rate(W) | 167 | 172 |