Cambro CMBH1826TvsMetro C5T8-ASB
Side-by-side holding cabinet comparison
Cambro CMBH1826T
Internal Volume
17.9cu ft
Max Idle Rate
290W
Energy Usage
122W
Doors
2
Metro C5T8-ASB
Internal Volume
18cu ft
Max Idle Rate
290W
Energy Usage
169W
Doors
1
Key differences
Both models are closely matched on idle: 290 vs 290 W. The Metro C5T8-ASB is larger at 18 cu ft versus 17.9 cu ft.
Capacity
| Spec | Cambro | Metro |
|---|---|---|
| Internal Volume(cu ft) | 17.9 | 18 |
| Doors | 2 | 1 |
| Door / Wall Type | Solid | Solid |
Energy
| Spec | Cambro | Metro |
|---|---|---|
| Energy Usage(W) | 122 | 169 |
| Maximum Idle Rate(W) | 290 | 290 |