Cambro PCU1600HH615vsMetro C545-ASFS-U-A
Side-by-side holding cabinet comparison
Cambro PCU1600HH615
Internal Volume
12.4cu ft
Max Idle Rate
267W
Energy Usage
117W
Doors
2
Metro C545-ASFS-U-A
Internal Volume
11.1cu ft
Max Idle Rate
239W
Energy Usage
168W
Doors
1
Key differences
Metro C545-ASFS-U-A is 11% more efficient at 239 W versus 267 W for the Cambro PCU1600HH615. The Cambro PCU1600HH615 is larger at 12.4 cu ft versus 11.1 cu ft.
Capacity
| Spec | Cambro | Metro |
|---|---|---|
| Internal Volume(cu ft) | 12.4 | 11.1 |
| Doors | 2 | 1 |
| Door / Wall Type | Solid | Solid |
Energy
| Spec | Cambro | Metro |
|---|---|---|
| Energy Usage(W) | 117 | 168 |
| Maximum Idle Rate(W) | 267 | 239 |