Cambro PCU1600HH615vsMetro C5T5-ASB
Side-by-side holding cabinet comparison
Cambro PCU1600HH615
Internal Volume
12.4cu ft
Max Idle Rate
267W
Energy Usage
117W
Doors
2
Metro C5T5-ASB
Internal Volume
12cu ft
Max Idle Rate
258W
Energy Usage
165W
Doors
1
Key differences
Metro C5T5-ASB is 3% more efficient at 258 W versus 267 W for the Cambro PCU1600HH615. The Cambro PCU1600HH615 is larger at 12.4 cu ft versus 12 cu ft.
Capacity
| Spec | Cambro | Metro |
|---|---|---|
| Internal Volume(cu ft) | 12.4 | 12 |
| Doors | 2 | 1 |
| Door / Wall Type | Solid | Solid |
Energy
| Spec | Cambro | Metro |
|---|---|---|
| Energy Usage(W) | 117 | 165 |
| Maximum Idle Rate(W) | 267 | 258 |